Editor: Your article "Massachusetts Miracle" was excellent but I find it surprising that you didn’t think Mr. Brown would win. I have been following the videos and blogs about what is happening across the nation including when President Obama made an appearance with Ms. Coakley. The expression on the majority of the faces in the audience was a look of doubt. When Mr. Brown stated that the Senate seat was not Mr. Kennedy’s, it was the seat of the people; this statement resonated like a bombshell and I believe was key to his election along with his promise to vote against the Health Care Bill and Cap and Trade. The majority of the people in Massachusetts were in an ugly mood and did not like the way the Democrats in Congress was acting and they wanted to do something about it. They did. Bud Grounds, Tampa, Fl

Editor: Regarding “Massachusetts Miracle,” for a change I watched MSNBC election night just to see them squirm and back talk.  It was great watching the Liberals suck air for a change.  I thought Kieth Olberman was going to throw up.  Congratulations to Scott Brown.  The Kennedy Dynasty is now a thing of the past.  It should be the beginning of the end for the new Socialist regime. Gearold O Batson, Hampstead, NC  

Editor: Regarding “Massachusetts Miracle” what effect do you think the tea party folks will have on the 2010 election? Most of ours — and we have three separate groups in Bucks County — are anti-Republican party, with the key word being "party." I also heard there were some in Massachusetts who thought Scott Brown was not "conservative enough."  Somewhere along the line he must have voted for a tax hike. Oops. I like the truck effect. Pat Wandling 

Editor: Regarding “Massachusetts Miracle” Sen. Scott Brown is a win for health care bill death but he is NOT a conservative. He is like Giuliani (a social liberal). So I would not say that Glen Beck was wrong in reserving full support for Brown. We call that a RINO (Republican in Name Only) where I come from. Dave Palmer

Editor: Regarding “Massachusetts Miracle” all I can say is “approved.” Harold Rozier

Editor: I agree with Dennis Avery’s “Climate Scientists’ Beliefs” in that, Where is the proof that the greenhouse gas effect exists? The greenhouse gas effect was disproved in 1909 by R.W. Wood a professor of physics at John Hopkins University and an expert in IR and UV radiation. Why isn’t this information being distributed? Other physicists have shown that the ghg effect violates fundamental laws of physics. There are many references including the report of Alan Carlin of the US-EPA that shows that CO2 does not cause global warming. Bert Klein

Editor: Regarding Kay Coles James’ “Politicizing Fed Healthcare” in the Senate health care bill proposing the U.S. Office of Personnel Management run a national public plan for all, I say “ no way, Jose”!  Can you imagine the chaos!  And for whose sake? Surely, not for the interests of the civil servants with OPM’s attention directed away from them to what would be a much greater responsibility.  Has the President and Congress lost their way or merely their minds? Estelle Denton

Editor: As Brent Bozell’s “Orwellian Recovery” demonstrates, what does one suppose the liberal media has to gain from deliberately distorting the news in Obama’s favor? They attack his opponents and support his followers. I suggest we no longer watch their newscasts. They must think all Americans are stupid and cannot think for themselves. Americans are very in tune when issues affect their children and grandchildren. I for one watch Fox News when I want to know what is really happening. Nancy Cooper